Romans 16:16

A great article! 

“Often on our local TV station, the cofC preachers will talk about the churches of Christ in Romans 16:16—and you could in the King James Version and many other translations.  From this kind of literal citation of Scripture, without regards to the context, they have developed a theology about the name of the church, which just happened to be the “Church of Christ” that came out of the Stone/Campbell movement.

  They often reasoned like this: Where in the Bible do you read of a Baptist Church or a Methodist Church or a Presbyterian Church?  One can read about the Church of Christ Church inRomans 16:16, but one cannot read about the others.

On the surface, their argument appeared to have some validity, but the dilemma in this kind of dialectic was/is that Christ was not our Lord’s name, but rather, his official appellation (title).  Matthew (1:21) tells us that his name was Jesus. For some reason, we never cited Romans 16:4 that speaks of “the churches of the Gentiles.” Is “churches of the Gentiles” also the name of the church? Also, they never called attention to Galatians 1:22: “I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ.”  Is the “churches of Judea” the name of the church also?  To advance the notion that Romans 16:16 is the name of the church is to outrun the evidence in the text.

 The question that confronts every Christian, as it did me, is: does Paul designate the denominational Churches of Christ in Romans 16:16 as the Churches of Christ today?  The true Church of Christ had to do with my particular fellowship, no one else, all others were digressive. In fact, they taught that everyone who disagreed with their brand of orthodoxy was on the way to “hell.” 

Jesus died for persons and not for their opinions or ideas, right or wrong, and those for whom he died must be more important to us than anything for which he did not die. As God accepted us in our weakness, with mistaken ideas, warped views and unhealthful attitudes, so we must accept each other in the same state or condition.  We must not make the kingdom of heaven to consist of our convictions, attitudes or opinions, but of citizens who must be tolerant of each other in such matters, else there can be no kingdom of heaven at all.This article is from Randy’s blog, which you can find here

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Romans 16:16

  1. Hey Nathan. The more we study behind these guys-the easier it is to see thru them and their legalistic doctrines. I think if the local preachers and pastors would look into this as much as you and I have, they would see how flimsy the arguments are from these men in town. I have not watched them in weeks and dont plan to…

    They keep asking about Jason as if they dont know anything-I find that almost funny. They dont want people knowing that Jason no longer holds to his views he once taught. The good part is people are still emailing Jason and they too know what I say is true. Why dont “faithful” and George and these other men email Jason, seeing his email is still the same as it was….

  2. And they keep his old website up, as if nothing was wrong.

    They are either blatantly dishonest, or just not very good at website upkeep. I would believe the second one of Johnny and James (when’s the last time they’ve updated their blogs?), but Norm is very current on his blog. He also seems the most genuine of the three, and so I’m really surprised he continues with the charade that Jason’s still in their fold.

  3. Matt Johnson / Mike Sweeney / Randy Craiger http://churchesofchrist.wordpress.com/

    Posted in Church of Christ, Denominations, Friends, Gospel, Liberty, Love, Unity, church by churchesofchrist on February 5th, 2008

    Due to lack of time, I have decided to take this blog/site into other States and have ask the assistance of two gentlemen from the Christian Church. Mike Sweeney and Matt Johnson will be posting on the blog and moderating comments along with myself.

  4. I think Norm most likey has conformed to the ways of Johnny. He even told me he had no plans to post my comments on his site so that people could see I also changed my views of them and their doctrine, so I am not suprised that Jasons site is still up.

  5. Wonder why Shawn doesnt address this post?? He knows that HIS denomination was borm during the RM, thatS why he is quite about this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s